The true IQ differences are marginal to a level it becomes your very own personal preference. ![]() It doesn't make for me sense to switch camera's and go over adaptors and many compromises too. You're choosing the EF/R mount, the F/Z mount, or the E mount, and the rest of the accessories. In that respect it is not so much the camera itself, but the system where you are looking at. The way you can deploy your system in various circumstances, the way you can rely and further build on it. For me there is no feature or gimmick with much more humble equipment than this.Īs a fine art/professional photographer, versatility is always key. I think the best camera is very much a personal opinion. * With SD card: battery life rated at 380/360 shots with XQD card It's these factors that end up making the cameras a good fit for different types of shooting. This is where actually using the cameras comes in, as the reality is that they're all significantly different in terms of ergonomics, user interface design, and AF performance. The other three cameras are almost certainly built around essentially the same sensor, though, so the differences between them are even slighter. The Canon has higher nominal resolution and a smidge less processing flexibility, as a consequence of lower dynamic range. There's not a lot to choose between them in terms of Raw performance, either. Aside from a few outliers (in-body stabilization and viewfinder resolution for example), there's just not a lot to choose between them in terms of pure specification. Perhaps the most striking detail here is how few boxes can be marked in red or green. ![]() In an accompanying article we look at where each of the lens systems has got to and where they're going:Ĭlick to read about the state of full-frame mirrorless lens lineups Specifications compared In this roundup we'll look at which of the cameras (with most current firmware) stand out for a series of common types of photography: But it's worth looking hard at whether your favorite brand's new system is really the one best suited to your needs.Īll of this makes a decision between different camera bodies more significant than in the past. ![]() The temptation, of course, is to stick with what you know, and put the emphasis on the money already sunk into your lens collection. This could be the best moment for most users to consider a change of system DSLR users should think seriously about whether the benefits of persisting with thier current camera brand is worth a short-term retention of potentially better lens compatibility, or if this would be outweighed by taking this opportunity to switch horses. ![]() This is likely to present the lowest-barrier opportunity for most users to consider a change of system since most DSLR lenses can be adapted to some degree onto any of the new systems. Perhaps more than at any time in the industry's history, we're seeing the big camera makers adopt new lens mounts for some of their leading products. Now that the lens lineups have been better fleshed-out and firmware updates have provided some additional polish, we thought it was time to take another look at the circa $2000 full-frame mirrorless cameras, their lens options and how they now stack up. However, despite the five-year head start, it was a far from universal or emphatic victory. In July of 2019, we looked at three of those cameras and concluded the a7 III was the strongest all-rounder: the model that was pretty good at everything.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |